(07-04-2012 04:39pm)gups4u Wrote: Hi All,
Urgent help needed, on 07/03/12 I purchased my Range Rover Evoque TD4 pure from a local dealer in Australia. At the time of collection was I was told that the vehicle was fitted with a mis-fuelling device and as a result it would be ‘impossible for fill the car with the wrong type of fuel’.
Yesterday 04/04/12 during a routine fill up at the service station this mis-fuelling device component failed. The car has only done 1300km and is brand new still under a month old.
How can this be possible, does the mis fueling device have an inherent fault, the car is awaiting diagnostics but after mis-fueling has been driven <500 meters.
Can I claim under warranty as the part failed? Does the device work on/in Australian petrol/service stations?
Please help and the insurance company have advised they will not assist. At present I am very stressed about the whole situation without a car and financially worried.
Gurpreet
Australia
I am really sorry to hear of your plight. Sadly, it would be foolish to suggest that this is not bad or give you false encouragement. Crucially, though, you didn't say how much of the wrong fuel you had put into the tank before you realised. If you have put petrol in a diesel tank, it is commonly held (including by the AA) that you can get away with a certain percentage particularly if there was a reasonable amount of diesel in the tank in the first place, and then you made sure (having spotted the error and stopped quickly) that you then fill up with diesel. Amazingly, the AA quote a figure of as much as 5 litres for a modern common rail engine (like an Evoque) and supposedly 10 litres for a lower pressure injection engine. (These seem very high to me, and I don't know how much evidence it is based on, and clearly there is no guarantee). However, the point is that it is not 'curtains' if you put a small amount in. However, if you inadvertently fill the majority of the tank with petrol, then you can't even afford to switch the ignition on, as it energises the fuel pump immediately, let alone start the engine, so, unfortunately, even 500m would be too much, and there is then a serious risk of the damage suggested by Tim.
The misfuelling device closes a flap in your fuel filler neck. If it successfully closed as a result of offering the wrong nozzle into it, the fuel would back up immediately and should stop the pump, and not much fuel, if any, would get into the tank. Although the holes in the neck outside the flap are at the top of the tube rather than the bottom, presumably any surplus fuel would find its way through them to the ground. However, looking at the fuel filler in my car (without the benefit of a nozzle to experiment with) it might be possible to 'beat' the device by releasing fuel with the nozzle only partially entered. I'm sorry that is not very encouraging.
If Land Rover insist on changing the engine, or (I'd have thought more likely - but still very expensive - replacing prone components such as seals and the high pressure pump) and the cost was prohibitive, you could, as the least worst option just have the fuel tank drained and soldier on without an engine warranty, keeping your money in your pocket to pay for any repairs that become necessary in due course if they do. Land Rover are bound to take the no-expense best route when attending to this - you are the only one who can take the gamble.
Ediit: Sorry there is a bit of duplication here, someone else posted some of what I put while I was writing the reply.