(06-06-2013 08:24am)speary Wrote: What a load of crap!!!. The rear pads will clean any surface corrosion the same as the fronts do on the first application of the brakes or we would all be driving round with orange rust coloured rear disks.
I suspect that the high wear rate of the rear pads is due to the disks being quite small (front and rear) for a 1700kg car, thus they have to work harder. Most of my previous cars (coupes) i have got 40000+ from the fronts and never had to change the rears and they all had much larger disks
Although I don't believe this is the cause on new Evoques, it's not complete crap, this is definitely a factor generally, Take my Mazda, the Rear Discs and Calipers have all had to be replaced due to corrosion over the last 8 years, the fronts have never been changed, the BMW Mini we had also had its rear discs replaced, The rears are much more exposed to the salt and wet thrown up by the car and do a lot less work than the fronts.
A factor seems to be because the Mazda (like many 8 year old cars) has only Differential stability control not Braking Stability control, and so it conventionally wears the fronts out faster than the rears as they do nearly all the work and this can be seen in the Brake dust on the wheels, the rears are usually covered in Mud the Fronts in Brake dust.
Also likely with 4WD and hill start features the rear brakes do more of the work than a conventional FWD, these 3 factors are likely to be having an effect on rear brake wear.
The amont of work done by the brakes is effectively the same irrespective of the size of brakes, larger brakes are more efficient as they have a larger braking surface and can dispel heat better so will give more effective braking but the energy released through the brakes is basically the same, so for the given pad material and surface area of the pad the wear will be much the same. Bigger brakes would generally show lower wear because the surface area of the pad is larger.