Valuation? - Printable Version +- babyRR.com - The Range Rover Evoque Forum (https://babyrr.com/forum) +-- Forum: Range Rover Evoque Discussions (/Forum-Range-Rover-Evoque-Discussions) +--- Forum: My Range Rover Evoque (/Forum-My-Range-Rover-Evoque) +--- Thread: Valuation? (/Thread-Valuation) |
Valuation? - kriswilson - 24-08-2015 12:45pm Afternoon folks, Looking for a bit of guidance from the members in the know regarding realistic valuation? Around 18 months ago we traded in our 6 speed Evoque for one of the 9 speeds, we spec'd it very well and becase we have done so our local LR garage is finding it difficult to give us a trade in price. Spec is as follows; Dynamic 5dr with PLUS PACK Fuji White Ebony / Tan Black Pack Keyless Panoramic roof Privacy Glass Power Boot Also has the protection pack and 5 year service plan. Photo attached for illusatrations purposes - only 1 i have with me unfortunately. We have seriously out grown the Evoque now with new baby and dog and require something larger. RE: Valuation? - XFullFatTim - 24-08-2015 04:00pm Don't expect an LR dealer to offer 1c over the guide value. Plus Pack will add nothing , the one pack that keeps it's value is the Lux Pack as Lux models are listed separately in price guides. Speccing the Tan interior will make it harder for the dealer to sell as it is not popular (as I found with my last one even though it sold within 2 weeks!) The used market is awash with Evoques unfortunately. Black Pack will add nothing to the value neither will the power tailgate. You might get the cost of the panoramic roof back though as they are popular. Sorry to be the bringer of doom but my Lux Plus got me £35000 after 12 months and 8000 miles............... list price when it was new was£54000 and I got no discount on the RRS2 that replaced it too, it went on the dealers forecourt with an initial price of £45750..................... and slipped down to £42000 before iot was sold. RE: Valuation? - kriswilson - 24-08-2015 04:18pm Appreciated the response Tim, some good food for thought. |