+- babyRR.com - The Range Rover Evoque Forum (https://babyrr.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Range Rover Evoque Discussions (/Forum-Range-Rover-Evoque-Discussions)
+--- Forum: General (/Forum-General)
+--- Thread: Surely, the first CAT D (Classed as write off/salvage) Evoque! (/Thread-Surely-the-first-CAT-D-Classed-as-write-off-salvage-Evoque)
Pages: 1 2
Surely, the first CAT D (Classed as write off/salvage) Evoque! - evoquemayne - 21-05-2012 01:39am
This is pretty tough to look at!
http://www.copart.co.uk/c2/homeSearch.html?_eventId=getLot&execution=e2s1&lotId=10791272&returnPage=SEARCH_RESULTS
RE: Surely, the first CAT D (Classed as write off/salvage) Evoque! - invoke - 21-05-2012 04:10am
seems like the damage is done intentionally...
RE: Surely, the first CAT D (Classed as write off/salvage) Evoque! - Sarcastrix - 21-05-2012 07:10am
certainly a strange combination of damage.
RE: Surely, the first CAT D (Classed as write off/salvage) Evoque! - ED209 - 21-05-2012 07:55am
There was a damaged one for sale on ebay about last october.
RE: Surely, the first CAT D (Classed as write off/salvage) Evoque! - speary - 21-05-2012 08:19am
That looks like somebodys angry ex wife's work
RE: Surely, the first CAT D (Classed as write off/salvage) Evoque! - PhilSkill - 21-05-2012 08:50am
Quite sickening to look at, looks like someones taken a sledge and a razor blade to it...
RE: Surely, the first CAT D (Classed as write off/salvage) Evoque! - Griff449 - 21-05-2012 09:03am
Oh dear not good at all
RE: Surely, the first CAT D (Classed as write off/salvage) Evoque! - mark_n - 21-05-2012 09:05am
Only 1800 miles...
RE: Surely, the first CAT D (Classed as write off/salvage) Evoque! - XFullFatTim - 21-05-2012 09:51am
Stolen and recovered or Joyriders?
RE: Surely, the first CAT D (Classed as write off/salvage) Evoque! - evoquemayne - 21-05-2012 10:42am
(21-05-2012 07:10am)Sarcastrix Wrote: certainly a strange combination of damage.
+1, exactly why I thought it was worth posting!
Agree this wasn't an accident. It's possible this was Stolen/Recovered, but I find it hard to accept it was quite that simple. Looking at the leather, you get the sense this was purposeful, because this sort of damage cannot happen by/during an accident. Also, the exterior damage (a smashed OSF window and the grand canyon of a dent on left centre part of the roof) is very focused. In this case parts of the car are wrecked/missing but a great percentage of it is immaculate - uncharacteristic of an actual accident.
Maybe you're right Speary. Imagine the argument - 'You haven't looked at me once since that bloody car arrived! You only care about the car...and that flippin' forum!'.
Clearly, she just doesn't get it.