(05-06-2012 05:21pm)mark_n Wrote: There are of course some other benefits from not having the pano roof. First, the car loses several 10's of kg high up which will improve both fuel economy and roadholding. Then there's the £2000 replacement cost if it gets cracked or scratched which may or may not be covered under the windscreen cover of your insurance.
Personally, I wouldn't be without it but I understand why it doesn't appeal to all though I'm a bit surprised at Leeselee's vehemence. Perhaps she's worried about some truck driver being able to see down the front of her dress...
like your answer, but no.
I got stuck with a pano roof (that actually opens) on my current car and have on previous cars. With other cars I have had 'no choice' when I wanted top spec and no queue for the car. A car has been built, fully specced up and ready send from overseas with a pano roof. So it has been a case of either take the roof or wait for months.
Anyone who has read my previous posts know I am a typical Londoner who has no patience and wants everything NOW!
I have a health issue which means I have problems with sunlight. To stop myself from passing out and other nasty symptoms (even with the UV technology on car glass) I have to wear a hat or not have the roof open.
Having the sunroof open with a hat on is a recipe for disaster. Wearing a hat when I have spent ages making my hair look nice is a no no as well! I am positive aircon was invented so that women do not have to open all the windows and ruin their hair.......
So, I hate a pano roof - always a reason! - now you know why!
I do love the tilting bit of the roof in rain and I will miss that.
By the way, any lorry driver that looks in when I have the chance of having the shade open or the roof open will see me and my gorgeous miniature dachshund asleep on the passenger seat - my dog is the one who gets stared at, not me!!!