Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
LUX Pack
cjfp
 

Posts: 2,917
Joined: Nov 2010
Location: Hampshire
Post: #21
RE: LUX Pack

Look like 19" Sparkle Silver Alloy Style 4 to me

Pure 3dr SD4 Tech Man ; Firenze Red ; 19" Style 3 ; Pano ; Ebony / Ivory Int ; Auto dim rear view ; 2 seats ; Park Aid - Rear cam ; Ext. folding mirrors ; Adap Xenon ; Fogs ; Mud Flaps ; Side Steps - Rec'd 28/12/11 - Sadly going 6/6/14 - Gone, now running BMW X6
14-05-2011 03:39pm
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
paulus599
 

Posts: 641
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Gateshead
Post: #22
RE: LUX Pack

(14-05-2011 03:38pm)Blackseries Wrote:  Its a Black version of the original LRX concept I think it was shown at the NY Motor Show - so its not the production Evoque.

Ah, that explains it. Like the way it sits, anyone planning to lower their cars like this. Or would that be sacrilege? Shocked

SD4 Prestige Coupe Auto, Fuji White, Pano roof, Park assist, Powered tailgate, Style 6 alloys, Element interior, Adaptive Dynamics. Build date: WAS 21/10/2011 Delivered 13/12/2011
Now: Evoque SD4 Coupe
Gone: TTS Roadster
Gone: Mini Cooper S
Gone: Mercedes SLK
14-05-2011 05:21pm
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kermit
 

Posts: 409
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Post: #23
RE: LUX Pack

(14-05-2011 05:21pm)paulus599 Wrote:  anyone planning to lower their cars

It would screw with the magneride.
15-05-2011 02:16am
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
paulus599
 

Posts: 641
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Gateshead
Post: #24
RE: LUX Pack

I thought that shorter springs would just mean that the shockers had less travel, if so, then that would't affect the way that the magnaride operates - would probably kill the off road ability though.

It's not something I would do. Its just that I always like the look of a car where the wheels fill the arches. Many years ago I had a Celica GT4, this was based on the rally car and never looked right to me because there was too much of a gap between the top of the tyres and wheel arch. I had a set of shorter progressive rate springs put in, these lowered the car by around 2" and the difference was amazing. Looked so much better and even improved the handling.

SD4 Prestige Coupe Auto, Fuji White, Pano roof, Park assist, Powered tailgate, Style 6 alloys, Element interior, Adaptive Dynamics. Build date: WAS 21/10/2011 Delivered 13/12/2011
Now: Evoque SD4 Coupe
Gone: TTS Roadster
Gone: Mini Cooper S
Gone: Mercedes SLK
15-05-2011 01:31pm
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kermit
 

Posts: 409
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Post: #25
RE: LUX Pack

(15-05-2011 01:31pm)paulus599 Wrote:  I thought that shorter springs would just mean that the shockers had less travel

Shorter springs are generally stiffer, thus the calibration of the damper would need to be adjusted to compensate; Magneride or no Magneride.
16-05-2011 01:17am
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
paulus599
 

Posts: 641
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Gateshead
Post: #26
RE: LUX Pack

(16-05-2011 01:17am)Kermit Wrote:  Shorter springs are generally stiffer, thus the calibration of the damper would need to be adjusted to compensate; Magneride or no Magneride.

I don't think that's strictly true. Shorter springs from a reputable company (such as Eibach) will be tuned to suit a particular car make and model, they won't just be the same spring with a bit cut off. The damper is only there to control rebound rate and won't be affected by a shorter spring - well as long as the manufacturer has done their work correctly.

SD4 Prestige Coupe Auto, Fuji White, Pano roof, Park assist, Powered tailgate, Style 6 alloys, Element interior, Adaptive Dynamics. Build date: WAS 21/10/2011 Delivered 13/12/2011
Now: Evoque SD4 Coupe
Gone: TTS Roadster
Gone: Mini Cooper S
Gone: Mercedes SLK
16-05-2011 11:24am
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kermit
 

Posts: 409
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Post: #27
RE: LUX Pack

(16-05-2011 11:24am)paulus599 Wrote:  The damper is only there to control rebound rate

Not true. Dampers control both bump and rebound.
17-05-2011 02:22am
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
paulus599
 

Posts: 641
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Gateshead
Post: #28
RE: LUX Pack

(17-05-2011 02:22am)Kermit Wrote:  Not true. Dampers control both bump and rebound.

Up to a point maybe. My point is that you do not need to recalibrate dampers just because you fit shorter springs. I and I'm sure millions of other people can testify to this because we have done it.
We are obviously not going to agree about this though so I suggest we take this off the forum and have the discussion through PM's Smile

SD4 Prestige Coupe Auto, Fuji White, Pano roof, Park assist, Powered tailgate, Style 6 alloys, Element interior, Adaptive Dynamics. Build date: WAS 21/10/2011 Delivered 13/12/2011
Now: Evoque SD4 Coupe
Gone: TTS Roadster
Gone: Mini Cooper S
Gone: Mercedes SLK
17-05-2011 08:09am
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
babyRR is an independent web site and not affiliated with Land Rover