(02-03-2012 12:26am)jiggyjaggy Wrote: Sorry can I ask you reasoning behind point 2? How is it the agents fault that a member of a public thinks the house/apartment you were purchasing is worth more? I agree its poor form that the agent didn't have the balls to call you, but aren't you blaming the obsession with increasing house prices on the agent rather than the new buyer? 
The agent has a choice in how he operates as far as I'm concerned. He is duty bound to inform the vendor of any offer that comes in, but he could if he wanted to, walk away and not deal with the vendor any further due to the unethical nature of the behaviour. I have walked away from very lucrative deals at work due to the unethical nature of the deals in question...perfectly legal deals, but unethical. I also part-own a tattoo supplies business and we are one of only a handful of companies that refuse to sell tattoo equipment to the general public due to our beliefs about maintaining the tattoo industry. Again, this is missing out on lucrative opportunities, but our ethics dictate. So I don't EXPECT the agent to turn down business at this point, but many people suffer badly due to gazumping (in my case the impact is relatively trivial in this instance) and Estate Agents are in a position where they could deal with it.