(24-03-2012 05:50pm)XFullFatTim Wrote: One thing that would be very useful in all What Car? group tests would be to compare like with like for the costs of the cars when they are all brought to the same equipment level. For example, your previous tests have claimed that the Evoque is very expensive compared to it's rivals from BMW and Audi, yet when you add the extras onto the BMW or Audi to equal what is standard in the Evoque they are more often than not somewhat more expensive than the RR.
I'd agree with Tim there, obviously the cars you get for testing won't be of similar spec as it's whatever you've been provided with at the time, but when doing side by side paper comparisons, the standard fit/options are often what adds cost (or not if standard), and suddenly the comparison can seem very different. Most people have features they like and would buy whatever car they choose, be it Air-con, leather, keyless entry, rear seat entertainment etc. So comparing like for like spec (as near as can be) when it comes to Price is very important.
Just speced an Audi Q3 to as near as I could to my Evoque, But couldn't get the higher horse power with manual gearbox, so 140hp engine came in under £2000 less than my Evoque. So starting price may look attractive and make it available to people with a lesser budget but comparitively very little difference once the cars become equal spec, didn't see electric tail gate or panoramic roof either.
Oh it looked damn ugly too