Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
|
|
Thread: CD Player
Post: RE: CD Player
My previous Evoque was a pure tech and came with the entry level meridian system complete with CD player and the system sounded great. I recently replaced the car with an SE tech which now has landrov... |
|
yosser395 |
In Car Electronics |
7 |
4,398 |
23-08-2016, 09:51pm |
|
|
Thread: CD Player
Post: RE: CD Player
(22-08-2016 07:31pm)Richard-writes Wrote: I have an Evoque SE Tech on order due to be delivered at the end of September. I'm told this will not have a CD player and that instead I should use a... |
|
yosser395 |
In Car Electronics |
7 |
4,398 |
22-08-2016, 09:11pm |
|
|
Thread: Quandary for 2017MY Evoque buyers
Post: RE: Quandary for 2017MY Evoque buyers
(21-08-2016 03:41pm)bigmac3161 Wrote: Adblue non so far but I don't do big miles. Was worried about the 2lt oil stove feeling gutless as its my first ever diesel. But I've been pleasantly surpr... |
|
yosser395 |
General |
9 |
5,323 |
21-08-2016, 04:43pm |
|
|
Thread: Quandary for 2017MY Evoque buyers
Post: RE: Quandary for 2017MY Evoque buyers
(20-08-2016 09:13pm)bigmac3161 Wrote: 2lt is decent in my evoque urs must be broke don't see it working in a RRS thou. Suppose there just following BMW as they've a 2lt X5 for skinflints;)
Don... |
|
yosser395 |
General |
9 |
5,323 |
20-08-2016, 09:23pm |
|
|
Thread: Quandary for 2017MY Evoque buyers
Post: RE: Quandary for 2017MY Evoque buyers
2.0 Diesel engine in the RRS will be a disaster. It won't pull the skin of a rice pudding in the Evoque! |
|
yosser395 |
General |
9 |
5,323 |
20-08-2016, 08:42pm |
|
|
Thread: 2.2 sd4 engines
Post: RE: 2.2 sd4 engines
I hear there is a 245bhp Diesel engine around the corner? Not sure if it's 4 or 6 cylinder but supposed to be a twin turbo? |
|
yosser395 |
General |
16 |
11,358 |
20-08-2016, 08:17am |
|
|
Thread: 2.2 sd4 engines
Post: RE: 2.2 sd4 engines
After owning a 2016 Evoque for six months I have to say the new 2.0 litre Diesel engine is a disaster. It's underpowered only returns 42 mpg and drinks 2 litres of adBlue per 1000 miles! This is a car... |
|
yosser395 |
General |
16 |
11,358 |
19-08-2016, 11:03pm |
|
|
Thread: 2.0 vs 2.2 engine
Post: 2.0 vs 2.2 engine
5000 miles on my 2.0 Evoque now and I am still struggling to like this new engine. Fuel consumption is 44mpg which is only 2mpg more than my last 2.2 evoque. The engine is noticeably down on power esp... |
|
yosser395 |
My Range Rover Evoque |
2 |
3,884 |
08-06-2016, 10:02pm |
|
|
Thread: 2014 vs 2016 MPG & Sound System
Post: RE: 2014 vs 2016 MPG & Sound System
(13-04-2016 10:07am)PhilSkill Wrote: I guess you have moved from the Meridian to the new Standard non meridian system yosser?
Yes that's correct no comparison on sound quality but there are so... |
|
yosser395 |
My Range Rover Evoque |
22 |
12,220 |
13-04-2016, 09:03pm |
|
|
Thread: 2014 vs 2016 MPG & Sound System
Post: 2014 vs 2016 MPG & Sound System
Just changed from a 2014 2.2 to a 2016 2.0 SE tech. I have to say I'm really disappointed at the MPG as I'm only getting 40 which the 2.2 was giving me plus I now have to pour ad blue in to this one a... |
|
yosser395 |
My Range Rover Evoque |
22 |
12,220 |
12-04-2016, 08:15pm |
|
|
Thread: Poor Headlamps
Post: Poor Headlamps
i've had my evoque pure now for 6 months and have covered 14,000 miles
It returns 38mpg and has been 100% reliable.
My only gripe is the poor non xenon headlamps.....has anyone carried out an HID upgr... |
|
yosser395 |
Modifications |
5 |
3,122 |
04-08-2012, 03:48pm |