Search Results
Post Author Forum Replies Views Posted [asc]
  Thread: CD Player
Post: RE: CD Player

My previous Evoque was a pure tech and came with the entry level meridian system complete with CD player and the system sounded great. I recently replaced the car with an SE tech which now has landrov...
yosser395 In Car Electronics 7 4,398 23-08-2016, 09:51pm
  Thread: CD Player
Post: RE: CD Player

(22-08-2016 07:31pm)Richard-writes Wrote:  I have an Evoque SE Tech on order due to be delivered at the end of September. I'm told this will not have a CD player and that instead I should use a...
yosser395 In Car Electronics 7 4,398 22-08-2016, 09:11pm
  Thread: Quandary for 2017MY Evoque buyers
Post: RE: Quandary for 2017MY Evoque buyers

(21-08-2016 03:41pm)bigmac3161 Wrote:  Adblue non so far but I don't do big miles. Was worried about the 2lt oil stove feeling gutless as its my first ever diesel. But I've been pleasantly surpr...
yosser395 General 9 5,323 21-08-2016, 04:43pm
  Thread: Quandary for 2017MY Evoque buyers
Post: RE: Quandary for 2017MY Evoque buyers

(20-08-2016 09:13pm)bigmac3161 Wrote:  2lt is decent in my evoque urs must be broke don't see it working in a RRS thou. Suppose there just following BMW as they've a 2lt X5 for skinflints;) Don...
yosser395 General 9 5,323 20-08-2016, 09:23pm
  Thread: Quandary for 2017MY Evoque buyers
Post: RE: Quandary for 2017MY Evoque buyers

2.0 Diesel engine in the RRS will be a disaster. It won't pull the skin of a rice pudding in the Evoque!
yosser395 General 9 5,323 20-08-2016, 08:42pm
  Thread: 2.2 sd4 engines
Post: RE: 2.2 sd4 engines

I hear there is a 245bhp Diesel engine around the corner? Not sure if it's 4 or 6 cylinder but supposed to be a twin turbo?
yosser395 General 16 11,358 20-08-2016, 08:17am
  Thread: 2.2 sd4 engines
Post: RE: 2.2 sd4 engines

After owning a 2016 Evoque for six months I have to say the new 2.0 litre Diesel engine is a disaster. It's underpowered only returns 42 mpg and drinks 2 litres of adBlue per 1000 miles! This is a car...
yosser395 General 16 11,358 19-08-2016, 11:03pm
  Thread: 2.0 vs 2.2 engine
Post: 2.0 vs 2.2 engine

5000 miles on my 2.0 Evoque now and I am still struggling to like this new engine. Fuel consumption is 44mpg which is only 2mpg more than my last 2.2 evoque. The engine is noticeably down on power esp...
yosser395 My Range Rover Evoque 2 3,884 08-06-2016, 10:02pm
  Thread: 2014 vs 2016 MPG & Sound System
Post: RE: 2014 vs 2016 MPG & Sound System

(13-04-2016 10:07am)PhilSkill Wrote:  I guess you have moved from the Meridian to the new Standard non meridian system yosser? Yes that's correct no comparison on sound quality but there are so...
yosser395 My Range Rover Evoque 22 12,220 13-04-2016, 09:03pm
  Thread: 2014 vs 2016 MPG & Sound System
Post: 2014 vs 2016 MPG & Sound System

Just changed from a 2014 2.2 to a 2016 2.0 SE tech. I have to say I'm really disappointed at the MPG as I'm only getting 40 which the 2.2 was giving me plus I now have to pour ad blue in to this one a...
yosser395 My Range Rover Evoque 22 12,220 12-04-2016, 08:15pm
  Thread: Poor Headlamps
Post: Poor Headlamps

i've had my evoque pure now for 6 months and have covered 14,000 miles It returns 38mpg and has been 100% reliable. My only gripe is the poor non xenon headlamps.....has anyone carried out an HID upgr...
yosser395 Modifications 5 3,122 04-08-2012, 03:48pm
babyRR is an independent web site and not affiliated with Land Rover