WhatCar? Review - Printable Version +- babyRR.com - The Range Rover Evoque Forum (https://babyrr.com/forum) +-- Forum: Range Rover Evoque Discussions (/Forum-Range-Rover-Evoque-Discussions) +--- Forum: General (/Forum-General) +--- Thread: WhatCar? Review (/Thread-WhatCar-Review--448) |
WhatCar? Review - Blackseries - 13-07-2011 12:41pm A generally good review (damming with faint praise). No mention of fuel economy. .... and then a rather surprising 5*'s at the end. http://www.whatcar.com/car-news/range-rover-evoque-review/258129 I would like to see a non UK review. RE: WhatCar? Review - Charlie - 13-07-2011 01:10pm (13-07-2011 12:41pm)Blackseries Wrote: A generally good review (damming with faint praise). No mention of fuel economy. .... and then a rather surprising 5*'s at the end. Cheers for posting these links. Are the online articles the same as the ones in the magazines or are they more comprehensive? RE: WhatCar? Review - Gorjan - 13-07-2011 01:43pm About the interior: "The materials are more Land Rover than Range Rover, but that's not to say the fascia doesn't feel premium. The dashboard top surfaces use a padded cloth, with contrast stitching; it looks luxurious enough to warrant the posher badge. Nastier, harder plastics are present - but in the most part they are restricted to elements that are out of everyday line of sight." Freelander 2 has an interior which is far from being luxurious ... Not impressed. RE: WhatCar? Review - Blackseries - 13-07-2011 01:55pm (13-07-2011 01:43pm)Gorjan Wrote: About the interior: I think they are talking more Discovery than Freelander here. However when reviewers have a Prestige there is nothing but praise for the interior (even if they think they are driving a Dynamic). RE: WhatCar? Review - vision*R - 13-07-2011 04:46pm The materials were one of my main reasons to get the Prestige, so nothing new in the review. That doesn't mean the Pure / Dynamic finishes are bad, not at all. RE: WhatCar? Review - Blackseries - 14-07-2011 02:21pm (13-07-2011 01:10pm)Charlie Wrote: Are the online articles the same as the ones in the magazines or are they more comprehensive? Usually less comprehensive. For example there is quite a bit of supplementary information in the Autocar magazine (sort of what you would expect really otherwise why buy the magazine) that’s not online - comparisons with the X3 for example. I must say the TG Magazine review despite its length really didn't tell me anything more than the program ..... again no fuel consumption figures that I could find.... so really so far only Autocar has done what I would consider a proper road test. Mind you Carbuyer showed you can drive over a speed bump at 30mph without spilling a drink – so AD has justified its existence in that one manoeuvre in my book. BTW the "Compare 3 cars" section at WhatCar? has the Evoque ........ back again. RE: WhatCar? Review - vision*R - 14-07-2011 03:22pm When I saw the trick with the cup, my first reaction was that it looked quite fake. Maybe it was just badly filmed / cut... RE: WhatCar? Review - Blackseries - 15-07-2011 06:17pm A rather more in depth review from the site. Again all cars in the photos have 19" wheels - including the Dynamics. However it does mention that 20" wheels create more road noise in the review - so at least they have driven one with 20" wheels fitted. http://www.whatcar.com/car-reviews/land-rover/range-rover-evoque-crossover/full-review/25963-3 RE: WhatCar? Review - Gorjan - 15-07-2011 06:32pm So they drove Dynamic. Probably with AD as it is standard in UK, still they say there is quite a body roll. The refinment is not geeat obviosly, having wind and road noise. It would be nice to read some non UK review. |