Running Costs - Evoque v Audi v BMW - Interesting ! - Printable Version +- babyRR.com - The Range Rover Evoque Forum (https://babyrr.com/forum) +-- Forum: Range Rover Evoque Discussions (/Forum-Range-Rover-Evoque-Discussions) +--- Forum: General (/Forum-General) +--- Thread: Running Costs - Evoque v Audi v BMW - Interesting ! (/Thread-Running-Costs-Evoque-v-Audi-v-BMW-Interesting) |
Running Costs - Evoque v Audi v BMW - Interesting ! - Big G - 23-02-2012 01:19pm http://www.which.co.uk/news/2012/01/evoque-beats-german-rivals-on-running-costs-277637/ RE: Running Costs - Evoque v Audi v BMW - Interesting ! - THEMACS - 23-02-2012 01:27pm (23-02-2012 01:19pm)Big G Wrote: http://www.which.co.uk/news/2012/01/evoque-beats-german-rivals-on-running-costs-277637/ I think this is based on Manufacturers claims, but I guess in real life the Audi is probably Crap on juice as well!! And I Guess the Audi will be wort the same as a Packet of Crisps in 3 years time!! And its But Ugly to boot!! RE: Running Costs - Evoque v Audi v BMW - Interesting ! - ChuckieB - 23-02-2012 01:31pm (23-02-2012 01:19pm)Big G Wrote: http://www.which.co.uk/news/2012/01/evoque-beats-german-rivals-on-running-costs-277637/ Yes, so long as it is reliable it will have been been a good call on my part to purchase one! Noting their bench test on fuel consumtion for an SD4 is 38.7mpg (doesn't say auto or Manual!) RE: Running Costs - Evoque v Audi v BMW - Interesting ! - tetstb - 23-02-2012 02:19pm Total , I had a 2.7 TDi A6 automatic that easily returned 42. I'm not even getting close to 33 on my SD4 RE: Running Costs - Evoque v Audi v BMW - Interesting ! - THEMACS - 23-02-2012 08:24pm (23-02-2012 02:19pm)tetstb Wrote: Total , I had a 2.7 TDi A6 automatic that easily returned 42. I'm not even getting close to 33 on my SD4 Nevermind, At least you don't look like a Complete Now!! Joke!! |