Evoque on long-term test - Printable Version +- babyRR.com - The Range Rover Evoque Forum (https://babyrr.com/forum) +-- Forum: Range Rover Evoque Discussions (/Forum-Range-Rover-Evoque-Discussions) +--- Forum: General (/Forum-General) +--- Thread: Evoque on long-term test (/Thread-Evoque-on-long-term-test) |
RE: Evoque on long-term test - PhilSkill - 26-03-2012 01:56pm (24-03-2012 05:50pm)XFullFatTim Wrote: One thing that would be very useful in all What Car? group tests would be to compare like with like for the costs of the cars when they are all brought to the same equipment level. For example, your previous tests have claimed that the Evoque is very expensive compared to it's rivals from BMW and Audi, yet when you add the extras onto the BMW or Audi to equal what is standard in the Evoque they are more often than not somewhat more expensive than the RR. I'd agree with Tim there, obviously the cars you get for testing won't be of similar spec as it's whatever you've been provided with at the time, but when doing side by side paper comparisons, the standard fit/options are often what adds cost (or not if standard), and suddenly the comparison can seem very different. Most people have features they like and would buy whatever car they choose, be it Air-con, leather, keyless entry, rear seat entertainment etc. So comparing like for like spec (as near as can be) when it comes to Price is very important. Just speced an Audi Q3 to as near as I could to my Evoque, But couldn't get the higher horse power with manual gearbox, so 140hp engine came in under £2000 less than my Evoque. So starting price may look attractive and make it available to people with a lesser budget but comparitively very little difference once the cars become equal spec, didn't see electric tail gate or panoramic roof either. Oh it looked damn ugly too RE: Evoque on long-term test - WB - 26-03-2012 03:53pm (23-03-2012 11:10pm)johnwhatcar Wrote: Donny, Really glad someone mentioned this as I'd been told the same that LR have gone to great lengths to not show the two side by side - something about sharper lines on the LRX but it would be great to see that photo! RE: Evoque on long-term test - johnwhatcar - 01-04-2012 08:57pm Hi all. Just a quick note to say that I posted a brief update on the USB interface this week, on What Car?'s website. http://bit.ly/yDxL6S Am working on something that could get forum members involved - and in print, possibly - in the near future. Will keep you all posted! Regards to all, John RE: Evoque on long-term test - PhilSkill - 01-04-2012 11:20pm (01-04-2012 08:57pm)johnwhatcar Wrote: Hi all. Just a quick note to say that I posted a brief update on the USB interface this week, on What Car?'s website. Interesting thanks John, I put on the software improvement list about Album art and also not being able to play at a folder/album level, Have you had any drop outs or tried the usb stick interface rather than I pod? RE: Evoque on long-term test - ytshome - 01-04-2012 11:41pm (23-03-2012 03:35pm)johnwhatcar Wrote: Hi all, Good to hear from you John and welcome to the forum. I'm afraid that I just cancelled my subscription because I thought you were going all German on us but I'm sure because they do make some good cars. I'm looking forward to see how you get on with your new charge but when you do any comparisons tell the authors to to test the BMW's and Audis without the optional ride gadgets because without them they are different cars. I've had mine since mid September and it's proved reliable if a little thirstier and noisier from cold than I'd hoped. That said I do feel it's a good car and if they can change the ageing auto-box for something more in keeping with its general modernity then I'd be rating it as very good. Kind regards YT |