![]() |
6 Month Review - Printable Version +- babyRR.com - The Range Rover Evoque Forum (https://babyrr.com/forum) +-- Forum: Range Rover Evoque Discussions (/Forum-Range-Rover-Evoque-Discussions) +--- Forum: General (/Forum-General) +--- Thread: 6 Month Review (/Thread-6-Month-Review) |
RE: 6 Month Review - ED209 - 02-04-2012 02:01am Maybe Im more used to inferior cars but to be honest i think even my pure has a luxury feel and is nice and quiet inside. I also cannot understand why people buy a car then moan about boot space. Surely checking the size is fit for your needs is essential when buying a car? After all the evoque is only the same length as a ford focus so it was never going to be huge inside. RE: 6 Month Review - TiTan - 02-04-2012 03:05am Deducting two points from the interior for no fold down armrests, and giving it a 5 out of 10 overall? There is "personal opinion" and then there is "having a laugh" ![]() As for the gear selector, I am happy to admit that it is one of my favourite aspects of the interior and it would be a crying shame if there was an ugly shift stick sticking there instead. RE: 6 Month Review - chiggy - 02-04-2012 04:05am RE: 6 Month Review - Evoqess - 02-04-2012 05:35am Thread rating :9/10! This is a damn good read so I won't say too much here and let you get back to the owner opinions - just one thing, evaluate your needs carefully. Mine is the perfect car for a couple and their dog/s with an active lifestyle. I keep my folding bike in the back pretty much all the time ![]() RE: 6 Month Review - ant - 02-04-2012 07:01am OK - good thread and here's my 2p worth. I've had my Evoque for just over 6 months now so time to evaluate and temper the expectations I had while waiting. Looks 9/10 - It is a stunning vehicle, especially the 3 door. I went for the 5 door for practical reason (84 yo Mum & 82 yo Mum-in-Law who travel in back). It gets a lot of admiring looks wherever I go. This will eventually wear off as they become more common on the streets. It doesn't get 10/10 as that is reserved for the DB9. Speed 9/10 - It's adequate and everything I need these days. It will accelerate and cruise as fast as I need it to. I've had faster cars (along with points on my licence and speeding fines). It loses a point as I'd like the gear changes to be a bit quicker (without having to use flappy paddles). At the 1st service I'm going to request a gerbox ECU reset, as I've heard that may improve the response. 300bhp will be the one to have if you feel the need for speed!! Economy 8/10 - As with others, I'm not getting the economy I expected or LR advertised. I don't drive particularly agressively, so I'd expect from this engine to get 35+ mpg. I'm currently getting about 30. But after FFRRs doing low teens and a DB9 that could get into single figures (but what a noise!!!!), 30mpg is welcome. Ride 10/10 - It's very smooth, comfortable and a great place to be for short or long journeys. The same journeys in the Aston were more exciting but a little less comfortable. Interior 9/10 - When my kids were growing up and I had 2 dogs, I had FFRRs for 25 years (with roof box and trailer sometimes). Now they've grown, left home and the dogs are no more, I don't need as much room. The boot is adequate for me and the interior room is ok, but not cavernous. If you've got kids/dogs/luggage to carry, perhaps a better choice would be a Disco. I went for the prestige to get the soft leather and I do not regret it. I dislike grained leather and perforated leather. I loved the Dynamic seats but I'm pretty happy with the comfort of the ones I've got in the Prestige. One point deducted 'cos I would have loved the Dynamic exterior with the seats and with the Ambience interior, which couldn't be ordered. Pan roof is excellent. Gadgets 10/10 - TV, Dual screen, Sat Nav, I-Pod, DAB radio, voice command, hard drive, phone connectivity, etc are all great. I've got no complaints and need no improvements. Practicality 9/10 - At present it's everything I need in my personal vehicle. In common with others on here, this is one of a fleet of family vehicles, so we have other cars for other purposes. The Evoque cannot do everything for us. We have a Defender 110 (12 seats, massive carrying capacity and offroad ability), two C4 Grand Picassos (7 seats & huge boot), a Triumph Stag (for roof down, summer, wind in hair, 'tax exempt' fun), as well as a few others. Getting one vehicle to do everything you want or need is pretty much impossible, so very often, car choice is a compromise. If I had to choose one of my cars to keep, it would be the Evoque. Premium Feel 9/10 - Leather is excellent, plastics and metals inside are good. It's not quite on par with FFRR, but it's 1/2 the price. It's superior to the C4, but it's twice the price. It is what it is. Overall 9/10 - A couple of things could have made it 9.5/10, but it would need to go a long way to get 10/10 for all the above categories. I'm still enjoying mine and would buy another. Long live the debate. ANT ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() PS Firenze is best!!!!! RE: 6 Month Review - Token - 02-04-2012 07:29am RE: 6 Month Review - Coolbanana - 02-04-2012 08:27am (02-04-2012 01:16am)gmaker Wrote: I can't believe no ones making more comments about the gearbox? Yep, it is slow to react in normal use - I put the car into Sport mode to eliminate the sluggish take-off / overtaking. That and paddles transform it and the car does move along instantly and briskly. If I'm in heavy traffic I don't bother but the RRE would benefit from a more efficient gearbox - a 7 speed PDK-type system like the Porsche's have would be great. RE: 6 Month Review - THEMACS - 02-04-2012 08:39am (02-04-2012 12:03am)AEC Wrote: I also don't have the issue with the speed of reverse camera engagement. Could it be that this has been fixed in a relatively recent software update? My Reverse Camera is very quick to react too!! ![]() RE: 6 Month Review - Big G - 02-04-2012 08:51am (02-04-2012 08:39am)THEMACS Wrote: My Reverse Camera is very quick to react too!! +1 RE: 6 Month Review - Dimitrios - 02-04-2012 10:19am +2 |