![]() |
Prestige Vs Dynamic Exterior - Printable Version +- babyRR.com - The Range Rover Evoque Forum (https://babyrr.com/forum) +-- Forum: Range Rover Evoque Discussions (/Forum-Range-Rover-Evoque-Discussions) +--- Forum: General (/Forum-General) +--- Thread: Prestige Vs Dynamic Exterior (/Thread-Prestige-Vs-Dynamic-Exterior) |
RE: Prestige Vs Dynamic Exterior - Coolbanana - 13-02-2012 10:51pm Wow Stef! ![]() I can't agree - I chose the Dynamic and love it! (13-02-2012 09:21pm)stef.c Wrote: -In normal non suv cars lowered sideskirts looks great and sporty. But on this suv crossover it brings it back down to earth again and makes it look less 4x4, more suped up hot hatch. The optical illusion you get that the car is sitting much higher from the ground from the dark sideskirts on the prestige/pure is gone. It would be fair to say that my wife has been a slow convert to the Evoque's charms and now likes my Dynamic but she finds the Prestige far too bling to the point that she said she would not have been seen in it had I bought one! Personally, I see her point but do like the Prestige - it has clean looks. If the Dynamic didn't exist I would happily have owned one. Ultimately, all the Evoque's look great - Pure, Prestige and Dynamic! ![]() RE: Prestige Vs Dynamic Exterior - stef.c - 13-02-2012 10:53pm (13-02-2012 10:43pm)THEMACS Wrote: Think you are taking this a bit too seriously!! You are right it is all about personal tastes but if people feel insulted from what has been posted, then may I suggest THEY have a problem!! Oh dear what have I started?! Like the Macs said I wasn't looking to start WWiii just starting a healthy debate! I am quite into design so maybe I've been over thinking this one a little... Feel free to put me in my place any one! RE: Prestige Vs Dynamic Exterior - Evoque U - 13-02-2012 10:56pm Totally agree coolbanana, that is the only problem LR has created. If only one model was available I would still purchase. RE: Prestige Vs Dynamic Exterior - Asty - 13-02-2012 10:59pm (13-02-2012 10:53pm)stef.c Wrote: Oh dear what have I started?! Nothing! The Dynamic is rubbish ![]() RE: Prestige Vs Dynamic Exterior - stef.c - 13-02-2012 11:01pm (13-02-2012 10:56pm)Evoque U Wrote: Totally agree coolbanana, that is the only problem LR has created. If only one model was available I would still purchase. Agreed! However there is more than one model available and Prestige is just....better. RE: Prestige Vs Dynamic Exterior - invoke - 13-02-2012 11:14pm I bought the car because of its dynamic look, as opposed to its prestigious or contaminated appearances ( both former have more of frog like silhouette) RE: Prestige Vs Dynamic Exterior - ChuckieB - 13-02-2012 11:17pm Personally I would want a mix of the 2! Certain options that were more important were specced or only available on the Prestige at the time so Prestige it was! To go down the "Presnamic" route woul have been OTT! RE: Prestige Vs Dynamic Exterior - Donny Dog - 13-02-2012 11:22pm (13-02-2012 11:17pm)ChuckieB Wrote: Personally I would want a mix of the 2! I agree! RE: Prestige Vs Dynamic Exterior - Wired - 13-02-2012 11:26pm Stef I think you analysed the design very well, even spotting things I had not yet noticed. I also agree with you on most parts, hence my order for a prestige ![]() Prestige Vs Dynamic Exterior - paulelescoces - 13-02-2012 11:30pm While I do like the exterior look of the dynamic I did wonder if I would regret it and wished I had gotten the grown-up classy model (prestige) saying that both look great and I smile every time I see an evoque on the road |