![]() |
OK. How good is the Si4 vs the SD4 - Printable Version +- babyRR.com - The Range Rover Evoque Forum (https://babyrr.com/forum) +-- Forum: Range Rover Evoque Discussions (/Forum-Range-Rover-Evoque-Discussions) +--- Forum: General (/Forum-General) +--- Thread: OK. How good is the Si4 vs the SD4 (/Thread-OK-How-good-is-the-Si4-vs-the-SD4) |
RE: OK. How good is the Si4 vs the SD4 - x5pea - 20-10-2011 10:34pm Having had quite a few big engines petrol Range Rovers I know all about poor fuel economy and fast 4x4's when driving the RRE i felt the difference between the sensible SD4 and the SI4 wasn't enough to pull me in that direction. Im pretty sure we will get a SD4 remap to take it up to similar performance as that of a std SI4. Resale was a big factor for me.... the SI4 will almost certainly depreciate quicker than that of the SD4 RE: OK. How good is the Si4 vs the SD4 - PAT - 20-10-2011 10:39pm DPF regeneration is a big concern to me given the short journeys I take in town so I'm going to arrange a test drive in the Si4 and will probably switch to that as I think I jumped into the diesel camp without weighing everything up at the start. Only doing less than 10,000 miles a year so the extra cost of diesel does not work in my favour plus the insurance on the petrol is cheaper than the diesel which surprised me. RE: OK. How good is the Si4 vs the SD4 - The Valeter - 20-10-2011 11:02pm (20-10-2011 10:39pm)PAT Wrote: DPF regeneration is a big concern to me given the short journeys I take in town so I'm going to arrange a test drive in the Si4 and will probably switch to that as I think I jumped into the diesel camp without weighing everything up at the start. I have driven the Diesel manual & I did think it was fab & so much better than my diesel Freelander but I have had the DPF thing bugging me as I do a lot of short journeys then:- I watched Watchdog this evening & there was an article about the DPF featuring a Fiat 500 & a Nissan Quashkai & given the issues I think I would be foolish to buy a diesel now they all have a DPF - as always one so called improvement probably being the result of Europe again means another bloody headache! RE: OK. How good is the Si4 vs the SD4 - DynamicRRV - 20-10-2011 11:27pm DPF=Definite Power FAILURE! RE: OK. How good is the Si4 vs the SD4 - berlin2011 - 21-10-2011 12:42am (20-10-2011 10:26pm)RacingSnake Wrote: diseasal ![]() ![]() RE: OK. How good is the Si4 vs the SD4 - Evoqess - 21-10-2011 07:28am (20-10-2011 10:34pm)x5pea Wrote: Im pretty sure we will get a SD4 remap to take it up to similar performance as that of a std SI4.But by the time you have your SD4 remapped I'll have my Si4 remapped twice ![]() Of course I'll just wait for the lads on this forum to ![]() I don't want to void any warranty as this is my first LR and something tells me a warranty for a LR might be more valuable than with some other brands ![]() OK. How good is the Si4 vs the SD4 - DDX - 21-10-2011 07:02pm Does anyone mind explaining why the DPF is particularly bad for short journeys? I have a SD4 on order but my wife will only do around 5000 miles a year, all of which are short stop/start journeys RE: OK. How good is the Si4 vs the SD4 - DynamicRRV - 21-10-2011 07:16pm That's the worst thing she can do! OK. How good is the Si4 vs the SD4 - DDX - 21-10-2011 07:50pm But why? What am i missing here? RE: OK. How good is the Si4 vs the SD4 - ytshome - 21-10-2011 08:02pm (21-10-2011 07:50pm)DDX Wrote: But why? What am i missing here? Hi, diesels aren't as efficient on short runs as they are on longer ones, which makes the petrol Evoque a bit more competetive in terms of fuel efficency. Also the DPF needs regenerating (depending on how its driven) between every 190-500 ish miles, which necessitates giving it a high speed run (A road or motorway) for approx 20 mins or so. |