Looks like i am stuck

@pedalpower - IMO, I think yr dealer no understand what he saying!

(10-10-2011 10:17pm)cjfp Wrote:  @pedalpower - IMO, I think yr dealer no understand what he saying!

think you are right

(10-10-2011 10:19pm)Pedalpower Wrote:  

(10-10-2011 10:17pm)cjfp Wrote:  @pedalpower - IMO, I think yr dealer no understand what he saying!

think you are right

Think Dealer know exactly what he say - Evoque is aimed at a new sector of the market not the traditional RR/LR owner although it does appeal to them as well. The new sector are more interested in mpg, CO2 and looks than they are in offroad capability. Hence the comment that in London there is a bigger demand for 2 wheel drive.

@rchdleigh - I was referring to comment re removal of xenons from Prestige and Dynamic.

(10-10-2011 10:27pm)cjfp Wrote:  @rchdleigh - I was referring to comment re removal of xenons from Prestige and Dynamic.

Ooops - note to self pay more attention next time.

No worries, thread could be read as u did due to my initial tardy response to the point I was making

(10-10-2011 10:27pm)cjfp Wrote:  @rchdleigh - I was referring to comment re removal of xenons from Prestige and Dynamic.

I too was referring to the headlamp comment

In relation to the 2wd situation, i fully agree with Phil, i think it is going to establish itself as a model in its own right, and from what the London sales guy said its going to be extremely popular. Bearing in mind 90% of all current cars on the road are prob 2wd, why would anyone not want the same fuel economy, tax bracket etc with the styling and quality of a RR